Current:Home > StocksArkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure -FinanceCore
Arkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure
View
Date:2025-04-15 23:15:06
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The Arkansas Supreme Court upheld the state’s rejection of signature petitions for an abortion rights ballot initiative on Thursday, keeping the proposal from going before voters in November.
The ruling dashed the hopes of organizers, who submitted the petitions, of getting the constitutional amendment measure on the ballot in the predominantly Republican state, where many top leaders tout their opposition to abortion.
Election officials said Arkansans for Limited Government, the group behind the measure, did not properly submit documentation regarding the signature gatherers it hired. The group disputed that assertion and argued it should have been given more time to provide any additional documents needed.
“We find that the Secretary correctly refused to count the signatures collected by paid canvassers because the sponsor failed to file the paid canvasser training certification,” the court said in a 4-3 ruling.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision removing the nationwide right to abortion, there has been a push to have voters decide the matter state by state.
Arkansas currently bans abortion at any time during a pregnancy, unless the woman’s life is endangered due to a medical emergency.
The proposed amendment would have prohibited laws banning abortion in the first 20 weeks of gestation and allowed the procedure later on in cases of rape, incest, threats to the woman’s health or life, or if the fetus would be unlikely to survive birth. It would not have created a constitutional right to abortion.
The ballot proposal lacked support from national abortion rights groups such as Planned Parenthood because it would still have allowed abortion to be banned after 20 weeks, which is earlier than other states where it remains legal.
Had they all been verified, the more than 101,000 signatures, submitted on the state’s July 5 deadline, would have been enough to qualify for the ballot. The threshold was 90,704 signatures from registered voters, and from a minimum of 50 counties.
In a earlier filing with the court, election officials said that 87,675 of the signatures submitted were collected by volunteers with the campaign. Election officials said it could not determine whether 912 of the signatures came from volunteer or paid canvassers.
Arkansans for Limited Government and election officials disagreed over whether the petitions complied with a 2013 state law requiring campaigns to submit statements identifying each paid canvasser by name and confirming that rules for gathering signatures were explained to them.
Supporters of the measure said they followed the law with their documentation, including affidavits identifying each paid gatherer. They have also argued the abortion petitions are being handled differently than other initiative campaigns this year, pointing to similar filings by two other groups.
State records show that the abortion campaign did submit, on June 27, a signed affidavit including a list of paid canvassers and a statement saying the petition rules had been explained to them. Moreover, the July 5 submission included affidavits from each paid worker acknowledging that the group provided them with all the rules and regulations required by law.
The state argued in court that this documentation did not comply because it was not signed by someone with the canvassing company rather than the initiative campaign itself. The state said the statement also needed to be submitted alongside the petitions.
veryGood! (59856)
Related
- John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
- After castigating video games during riots, France’s Macron backpedals and showers them with praise
- Untangling Elon Musk's Fiery Dating History—and the 11 Kids it Produced
- Thousands expected to march in New York to demand that Biden 'end fossil fuels'
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- Russell Brand Denies Sexual Assault Allegations Made Against Him
- Group of friends take over Nashville hotel for hours after no employees were found
- Mike Babcock resigns as Blue Jackets coach amid investigation involving players’ photos
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- What is UAW? What to know about the union at the heart of industry-wide auto workers strike
Ranking
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- Kelsea Ballerini Shares Her and Chase Stokes' First DMs That Launched Their Romance
- Climate activists spray Berlin’s Brandenburg Gate with orange paint
- Angels two-way star Shohei Ohtani out for remainder of season with oblique injury
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- ‘Nun 2' narrowly edges ‘A Haunting in Venice’ over quiet weekend in movie theaters
- Oregon launches legal psilocybin, known as magic mushrooms access to the public
- UN nuclear agency slams Iran for barring ‘several’ inspectors from monitoring its program
Recommendation
'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
Taylor Swift dominates 2023 MTV Video Music Awards
Anchorage scrambles to find enough housing for the homeless before the Alaska winter sets in
Week 3 college football winners and losers: Georgia shows grit, Alabama is listless
Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
If the economic statistics are good, why do Americans feel so bad?
Inter Miami CF vs. Atlanta United highlights: Atlanta scores often vs. Messi-less Miami
The auto workers strike will drive up car prices, but not right away -- unless consumers panic